LAW.coLAW.co

U.S. v. Paul A. Titcombe

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces2012-07-10No. No. 12-0286/AF
71 M.J. 355

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

dissent opinion

*BAKER, Chief Judge

(dissenting): Consistent with my views in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), and United States v. Fosler, 70 M.J. 225, 240 (C.A.A.F. 2011) (Baker, J., dissenting), I respectfully dissent.

majority opinion

CCA 37618. On further consideration of the granted issue, 71 M.J. 312 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (order granting review, May 1, 2012), and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that the portion of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals as to Additional Charge II and its specification, and as to the sentence is reversed. The decision of that court as to the remaining charges and specifications is affirmed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force for remand to that court for further consideration in light of Humphries.