LAW.coLAW.co

U.S. v. Wade L. Walker

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces2012-07-16No. No. 12-0410/MC
71 M.J. 363

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

CCA 9501607. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, and in view of United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209 (C.A.A.F. 2012), it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER APPELLANT WAS PREJUDICED AS A RESULT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, IN SPECIFICATIONS 1 AND 2 OF CHARGE V.

The portion of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals as to Charge V and the two specifications thereunder is reversed. Assuming, without deciding, that Appellant was prejudiced by his lack of notice as to these specifications, in light of Appellant’s sentence to mandatory life imprisonment for premeditated murder, he has not been prejudiced by this error as to his sentence. Accordingly, Charge V and its two specifications are dismissed and the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals as to the remaining charges and specifications and the sentence is affirmed. [See also ORDERS GRANTING PETITION FOR REVIEW this date.]

concurring-in-part-and-dissenting-in-part opinion

BAKER, Chief Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part): I agree that Appellant was not prejudiced for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in United States v. Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, 217 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (Baker, C.J., dissenting), to which I adhere. For the same reasons I respectfully dissent to the dismissal of Charge V and its specifications.