Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darrell James DeBrew appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. DeBrew v. Brooks, No. 5:10-ct-03198-D (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2011 & Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal eon-tentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although we decline to find that DeBrew’s challenges to his disciplinary convictions are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), we have reviewed the merits of De-Brews claims and agree that he fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.