MEMORANDUM
Ali Sobana, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir.2009). We deny the petition for review
Sobana contends that he faced past persecution and faces a clear probability of persecution in Indonesia as a moderate Muslim. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Sobana’s experiences during the May 1998 riots and at a nightclub in 2000 did not constitute past persecution. See id. at 1059-60 (two incidents of beating and robbery and being accosted by hostile mob did not compel finding of past persecution); Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (unfulfilled threats constituted harassment, not persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Sobana did not establish a clear probability of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003) (petitioner’s fear was “too speculative” and thus not objectively reasonable). We reject Sobana’s assertion that the BIA found there was no evidence Muslim extremists target other Muslims because it is belied by the record. Accordingly, Sobana’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2006).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.