LAW.coLAW.co

Stuart Wayne TOMPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Superintendent Sandra THOMAS, Department of Correction; Kenneth Hunt; Colbert L. Respass; David W. Keys; J. Haynes; William Basnight, III; Hattie B. Pimpong; Pamela J. Locklear; Rose Locklear; Billie J. Weaver; John Doe Locklear; Clifton Sutton; Paul Taylor; John Doe Hunt, Assistant Superintendent; Lynn Henry; John Doe Hunt, Sergeant; John/Jane Doe, Transfer Coordinator; Jane Doe; John Doe, Captain; M.C. Locklear; John Doe, Director Classification Committee; George Boysden; Marshall Pike, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-09-13No. No. 12-6723
478 F. App'x 31

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Stuart Wayne Tompkins appeals the district courts orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tompkins v. Thomas, No. 5:11-ct-03049-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2011 & Apr. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.