LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nabor CAMPILLO-VEGA, a.k.a. Eduardo Campillo-Vega, a.k.a. Juan Manuel Vega-Zuniga, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2015-02-24No. No. 13-10641
594 F. App'x 350

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Nabor Campillo-Vega appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Campillo-Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Campillo-Vega the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.