The record contains substantial evidence that supports the determination that the children’s best interests would be served by their removal from petitioner’s home (see Matter of O’Rourke v Kirby, 54 NY2d 8, 16 [1981]). The evidence also supports the finding that petitioner failed to provide one of the boys with his prescribed medication (see Matter of Joshua Noel A., 40 AD3d 749 [2007]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeney, Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
In the Matter of Rita Leibert, Petitioner, v. New York State Office of Children and Family Services et al., Respondents
82 A.D.3d 655919 N.Y.S.2d 332
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.