The challenged determination that there existed no probable cause to believe that respondent New York City Transit Authority had engaged in age and/or national origin discrimination was rationally based and therefore not subject to judicial disturbance (see Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc., L.P., 59 AD3d 362 [2009]; Matter of Malone v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 29 AD3d 364 [2006]; Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108 [1998]). Concur- — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
In the Matter of Ronnie Allen, Appellant, v. Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents, and MTA New York City Transit, Respondent
82 A.D.3d 585918 N.Y.S.2d 720
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.