LAW.coLAW.co

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Virginia Rose Ray, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation f/k/a Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility, Complainant, v. Virginia Rose Ray, Respondent

Wisconsin Supreme Court2011-03-16No. Nos. 2001AP1784-D & 2003AP1743-D
332 Wis. 2d 274797 N.W.2d 7882011 WI 17

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

concurrence opinion

Crooks, J.,

concurs in the denial of the petition for reinstatement and dissents from the portion of the order placing the file under seal.

majority opinion

The referees findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation are approved and adopted. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the file be placed under seal because it contains confidential information; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the day of this order, Virginia Rose Ray pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation the costs of this proceeding, which total $30,354.68 as of January 3, 2011.