The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the Supreme Court’s instructions to the jury. Viewing the Supreme Court’s charge as a whole, the instructions regarding credibility adequately conveyed to the jury the appropriate standard by which to evaluate the testimony of the complainant (see People v Gillyard, 70 AD3d 854, 855 [2010]; People v Francisco, 44 AD3d 870, 871 [2007]; People v Goodson, 35 AD3d 760, 761 [2006]; People v Hosannah, 2 AD3d 458, 459 [2003]). Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlton Simons, Appellant
82 A.D.3d 1132919 N.Y.S.2d 357
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.