—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Surrogate’s Court properly denied petitioner’s request to disallow legal fees for respondent law firm. The record amply supports the court’s implicit finding that respondent was not discharged for cause (see, Kyle v Kyle, 94 AD2d 866, lv denied 60 NY2d 557; see also, Teiehner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 978; Marschke v Cross, 82 AD2d 944). (Appeal from Order of Onondaga County Surrogate’s Court, Wells, S.—Attorney’s Fees.) Present—Pine, J. P., Hayes, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.
In the Matter of the Estate of Evelyn A. Stock, Deceased. Mary M. Stock, Appellant; Hancock & Estabrook, L. L. P., Respondent
244 A.D.2d 939668 N.Y.S.2d 119
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.