In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], cert denied 542 US 946 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 643-644 [2006]). Florio, J.E, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Arthur A. Small III, Appellant
91 A.D.3d 676935 N.Y.S.2d 892
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.