LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell Kent JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2011-02-02No. No. 09-15831
412 F. App'x 223

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Mitchell Kent Jackson, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.