The Family Court did not err in denying the father’s petition to modify a prior custody order dated August 31, 2009, so as to award him sole custody of the parties’ child. “A modification of an existing custody arrangement should be allowed only upon a showing of a sufficient change in circumstances demonstrating a real need for a change of custody in order to insure the child’s best interests” (Matter of Nava v Kinsler, 85 AD3d 1186, 1186 [2011]; see Family Ct Act § 652 [a]; Matter of Catalano v Catalano, 66 AD3d 1012, 1013 [2009]). Here, the father’s testimony did not establish a sufficient change in circumstances since the entry of the prior order (see generally Matter of Catalano v Catalano, 66 AD3d at 1013; Matter of Jennings v Small, 59 AD3d 546 [2009]). Dillon, J.E, Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
In the Matter of Mariano Morillo, Appellant, v. Lourdes Nunez, Respondent
91 A.D.3d 875936 N.Y.S.2d 910
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.