MEMORANDUM
Luis Cruz-Carrasco appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the six-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Cruz-Carrasco contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to address his non-frivolous mitigation arguments. We review for harmless error, see United States v. Munoz-Camarena, 631 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir.2011) (per curiam), and find no error. The record reflects that the district court expressly addressed Cruz-Carrasco’s mitigation arguments before it imposed a below-Guidelines revocation sentence.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.