Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions aie not binding piecedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s ordeis dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the iecoid and find no revei’sible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the xeasons stated by the distinct court. See Rutledge v. Roach, No. 4:10-cv-00035-JLK-MFU, 2010 WL 3835662 (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2010) & 2010 WL 4791840 (Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.