MEMORANDUM
Erick Thomas Red Dog appeals from the 33-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We dismiss Red Dog’s appeal.
Red Dog contends that his within-Guideline sentence is substantively unreasonable because it violates the parsimony principle and because it fails to account for his mitigating circumstances. We are precluded from reaching the merits of Red Dog’s claim by a valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir.2007) (en banc).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.