LAW.coLAW.co

In the Matter of Terry Curtis, Appellant, v. Penelope Curtis, Respondent

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division1997-12-31
245 A.D.2d 1148666 N.Y.S.2d 864

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

—Motion for permission to proceed as poor person and for assignment of counsel denied and appeal dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The notice of appeal limits the scope of the appeal to the purge provision (see, CPLR 5515 [1]; Sommers v Sommers, 203 AD2d 975, 977; Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 AD2d 132, 133), which has expired; thus, appellant is no longer aggrieved by that provision and is not entitled to appeal (see, CPLR 5511; Family Ct Act § 1118). Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.