LAW.coLAW.co

Joseph Michael GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.A. BIRD; Betty Brown, Defendants-Appellees, and Rich Jackson; North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2011-02-08No. No. 09-8093
410 F. App'x 713

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Bird, No. 3:06-cv-00308-GCM, 2009 WL 3722804 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.