LAW.coLAW.co

Simhah TAMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; Geico Indemnity Company; Geico General Insurance Company; Government Employees Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-04-24No. No. 11-2395
471 F. App'x 189

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Simhah Tamar appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tamar v. Geico Cas. Co., No. 1:10-cv-01067CMH-IDD, 2011 WL 4961961 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.