LAW.coLAW.co

David Eugene BRINKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES of America; Roscoe Ramsey, Doctor; Doctor Carlos Duchesne; P.A. Gonzalez; Warden Tommy Johns, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2012-07-12No. No. 12-6176
474 F. App'x 151

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Eugene Brinkley appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brinkley v. United States, No. 5:10-ct-03084-B O (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 2011) & 2012 WL 78376 (Jan. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.