LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Frank BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2012-06-07No. No. 11-15828
471 F. App'x 860

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess’s motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is DENIED.