LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fabian VAKSMAN, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2012-03-09No. No. 11-30240
471 F. App'x 674

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fabian Vaksman appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for dental services. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Vaksman seeks an order requiring the United States Marshals Service to pay for dental services for him. In light of Vaksman’s subsequent transfer to Bureau of Prisons’ custody, the appeal is dismissed as moot. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631, 99 S.Ct. 1379, 59 L.Ed.2d 642 (1979) (once a party is shown to lack a “legally cognizable interest in the outcome” of the adversary proceeding, the action is moot). DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.