LAW.coLAW.co

Ramon PRECIADO-JIMENEZ and Maria Delia Preciado, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2012-07-19No. No. 10-73888
474 F. App'x 646

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ramon Preciado-Jimenez and Maria Delia Preciado, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny the petition for review.

The Board did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ fourth motion to reopen as untimely and numerically-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c).

The Board did not abuse its discretion in declining to equitably toll the time and number limitations on motions to reopen on the ground that petitioners did not establish due diligence or prejudice from the alleged ineffective assistance of their prior attorney. See Iturribarria v. I.N.S., 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.