LAW.coLAW.co

Alphonso HAYNESWORTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jon Ozmint, Director of SCDC; Warden Bob Anderson; Associate Warden NFN Brillford; Major NFN Murray; Captain Edward Bittinger; Lieutenant NFN Brachel; Sergeant NFN Ferguson; Officer NFN Foreman; Sergeant NFN Hoosier; Ms. NFN Hunter; Officer Jenkins; Officer Jones; Dho S. Patterson; Ms. NFN Hunter, Law Librarian; Officer NFN Staats; Officer NFN Uptergraff; Mr. NFN Stevenson, Classification; Captain B. Hinger; Officer Uptagraft, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2010-02-25No. No. 09-7897
367 F. App'x 408

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD, 2009 WL 3233470 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.