MEMORANDUM
Mohmmed Enamul Bhuiyan Haq, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BÍA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Haq’s untimely motion to reopen because he did not establish changed circumstances in Bangladesh material to his claims to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Almaraz v. Holder, 608 F.3d 638, 640-41 (9th Cir.2010) (petitioner failed to show passage of trade agreement was material to his claim where documents he submitted were inconclusive, even if accepted as true).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.