Jerrold Ryan KEMMER, Appellant, v. BELTRAMI COUNTY; Beltrami County Sheriffs Department, a municipal corporation; Scott H. Hinners, individually and in his capacity as Investigator for the Beltrami County Sheriffs Department; Lee Anderson; Brian Ball, individually and in his capacity as Investigator for the Beltrami County Sheriffs Department; Sam Lundquist, individually and in his capacity as Investigator for the Beltrami County Sheriffs Department; Danelle Haugen, individually and in her capacity as Investigator for the Beltrami County Sheriffs Department, Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Jerrold Kemmer appeals the district court’s order granting defendants summary judgment and denying Kemmer’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) motion for a continuance in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

Following careful de novo review, see Sheets v. Butera, 389 F.3d 772, 776 (8th Cir.2004), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment, and we also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of Kemmer’s request for a continuance, see Rakes v. Life Investors Ins. Co. of Am., 582 F.3d 886, 893 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review for denial of Rule 56(f) motion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.