LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Edward JONES, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2013-01-23No. No. 12-7828
506 F. App'x 204

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Edward Jones appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court denied the motion because the Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 did not result in a change to the Guidelines sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.