This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is granted, and defendants’ cross-petition for certification in C-304-11 is hereby granted, limited to the issue whether plaintiff retains fifty percent ownership of Roger Professional Services and Roger Distributed Solutions.
ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF, v. ROGER, INC., ROGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., ROGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., ROGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-MOVANTS
210 N.J. 2540 A.3d 55
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.