This matter having been duly presented to the Court, it is ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied, provided, however, that the Court’s Order granting certification in C-303-11 is hereby corrected to provide that the grant is limited to the issue whether the gift of stock to plaintiff was conditioned on his continued employment.
ROBERT SIPKO, PLAINTIFF-MOVANT, v. KOGER, INC., KOGER DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS, INC., KOGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC., KOGER LIMITED (DUBLIN), RASTISLAV SIPKO AND GEORGE SIPKO, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
210 N.J. 2440 A.3d 55
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.