LAW.coLAW.co

Pottss Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1858
30 Pa. 168

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

— The decree of the court below is so well justified by the reasons assigned in the opinion of the learned president, showing that the devise in question passes a fee tail in the real estate, and an absolute interest in the personal property, that we do not feel called upon to add anything to it. Our own recent decisions are quite numerous in favour of the conclusion, at which he has arrived: 20 State R. 509; 23 Id. 9, 31, 338; 24 Id. 244, 248, 252; 26 Id. 227; 28 Id. 73, 93, 101.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellants.