LAW.coLAW.co

Randall Lee CONRAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; Dept. of Justice; R.A. Perdue, Warden; Mr. Creasy, Counselor; Ms. Wilson, Secretary; Mrs. Thrope, Officer, Defendants-Appellees, and Numerous FCI Gilmer Employees, Officers, Secretaries, Counselors, Case Managers, etc., Defendants

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2014-04-29No. No. 14-6134
569 F. App'x 162

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:12-cv-00133-GMG-JES (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.