PER CURIAM.
We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J.Tax 305 (Tax Ct.1985).
ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
9 N.J. Tax 90
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.