MEMORANDUM
Francisco Paul Rosales-Urquilla, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.
Rosales-Urquilla’s motion to take judicial notice of a receipt issued by USCIS showing that he filed a petition for a U-Visa is denied.
The BIA found Rosales-Urquilla’s motion to reopen was untimely because the motion was filed over thirteen years after the BIA’s final order and Rosales-Urquilla failed to present sufficient evidence of changed circumstances in El Salvador to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing motions to reopen. Rosales-Urquilla raises a contention regarding relief under the Convention Against Torture, but does not argue this issue is relevant to the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen as untimely. Nor does Rosales-Urquilla otherwise challenge the BIA’s basis for denying his untimely motion to reopen. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996). Thus, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.