PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion and order, Acevedo v. Potter, No. 08-cv-01468, 2011 WL 7092592 (D.P.R. Mar. 23, 2011), we summarily affirm. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons set forth in the district court’s opinion and order, Acevedo v. Potter, No. 08-cv-01468, 2011 WL 7092592 (D.P.R. Mar. 23, 2011), we summarily affirm. See 1st Cir. R. 27.0(c).