Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hussnain Ahmad Jafri, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider and reopen his immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen as untimely and number-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2014). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Jafri (B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Jafri has waived review of the Board’s denial of his motion to reconsider by failing to raise the issue in his appellate brief. See Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 714 F.3d 241, 248-49 (4th Cir.2013).