LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Brian COHEN, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2015-05-14No. No. 14-4913
603 F. App'x 201

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Brian Cohen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to strike orders tolling the Speedy Trial Act period, 18 U.S.C. § 3164 (2012), and for immediate release. We grant Cohen’s motions to expedite appellate review so far as is consistent with the workload of the court. See Fed. R.App. P. 9(a). However, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the- reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cohen, No. 1:14-cr-00310-WDQ-1 (D.Md. Nov. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

. The Government has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We conclude that we have jurisdiction; therefore, we deny the Government’s motion to dismiss.

. We deny Cohens motion to supplement his informal brief because the proffered supplement concerns evidence not in the record on appeal, and Cohen has not properly supplemented the record. See 4th Cir. R. 10(d).