LAW.coLAW.co

In the Matter of County of Oneida, Respondent, v. Nirav R. Shah, M.D., M.P.H., Commissioner, New York State Department of Health, et al., Appellants

New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division2015-05-01
128 A.D.3d 13816 N.Y.S.3d 510

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Bernadette T. Clark, J.), entered March 14, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, directed respondents-defendants to pay petitioner-plaintiffs pending claims for reimbursement in the amount of $3,123,878.56.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the petition-complaint in its entirety and granting judgment in favor of respondents-defendants as follows:

It is adjudged and declared that section 61 of part D of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been shown to be unconstitutional, and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs (see Matter of County of Chautauqua v Shah, 126 AD3d 1317 [2015]). Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Sconiers and DeJoseph, JJ.