PER CURIAM:
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gary Lynn Ward has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Ward has not fíled a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. However, in light of the nonrever-sible error in categorizing the conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(E)(ii), the judgment of the district court is REFORMED to show that Ward was convicted and sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(E)(1). See United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 369 (5th Cir.2009). Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th CiR. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.