LAW.coLAW.co

Otis Michael THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Imam Abdul Mailk SAAFIR; et al., Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2009-05-15No. No. 07-17037
327 F. App'x 733

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Upon de novo review, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the alternative ground that Thomas named the wrong parties. San Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2004). Defendants did not have the authority to make the accommodations requested by Thomas. See 15 Cal.Code Regs. § 3211. AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.