LAW.coLAW.co

RICHARD PASCH, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ELIZABETH PASCH, AND ELIZABETH PASCH, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. CHARLES STENBERG, DEFENDANT

New Jersey Supreme Court1929-12-30
8 N.J. Misc. 23

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

A boy, while playing ball in Union City, New Jersey, was struck and injured by defendant’s automobile. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the boy’s mother for $1,000 for expenses incurred by her, and a verdict in favor of the lad for $1,250. The plaintiffs’ rule for a new trial rests on the issue of •the adequacy of the damages in favor of the boy. In the light of the testimony of plaintiffs’ physician that he has made a complete recovery and that he merely suffers from a little toeing-in, it is unnecessary to disturb the verdict of the jury. The rule will be discharged.