LAW.coLAW.co

Jolly et al. v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Georgia1904-06-09
120 Ga. 418

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Evans, J.

The errors assigned were that the verdict was contrary to law and without evidence to support it* and contrary to a designated portion of the charge of the court. The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to authorize the verdict; and the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is Affirmed.

All the Justices concur.