LAW.coLAW.co

TONY PETER PAUL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. REPUBLIC VARNISH COMPANY, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

New Jersey Supreme Court1934-05-02
12 N.J. Misc. 525

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the printed book submitted in this case fails to disclose any judgment record, or any specification of the determinations or directions of the trial court with which the appellant is dissatisfied in point of law. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.