LAW.coLAW.co

Justino S. VALLE-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2014-03-11No. No. 10-71816
561 F. App'x 634

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Justino Valle-Garda petitioned for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) final order of removal on the ground that the BIA erred in concluding that Petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal. The BIA’s final order was issued on March 18, 2008, when it denied Petitioner relief from deportation but remanded to the immigration judge for voluntary departure proceedings. See Pinto v. Holder, 648 F.3d 976, 982 (9th Cir.2011). Petitioner sought review in this court on June 9, 2010, more than two years later. Because 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) limits our review to petitions filed within thirty days of the date of the final order of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider the petition. See Yepremyan v. Holder, 614 F.3d 1042, 1043 (9th Cir.2010) (per curiam) (noting that the time limit under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) is jurisdictional).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. In light of our disposition, the Governments motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is DISMISSED as moot.