LAW.coLAW.co

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo et al.; Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same; National Surety Co. v. Same; Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same; and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, et al. v. Same

Supreme Court of the United States1934-05-28No. No. 978; No. 979; No. 980; No. 981; No. 982
292 U.S. 611

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Ken tucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.