LAW.coLAW.co

In re Gill et al.

Supreme Court of Ohio2004-12-22No. No. 2003-2017
104 Ohio St. 3d 654

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question of state law is answered in the affirmative on the authority of In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335. McFadden & Associates Co., L.P.A., and David A. Freeburg, for petitioner, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Lisa Pierce Reisz, for respondent, Frederick L. Ransier III, trustee.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

dissent opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335. O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.