PER CURIAM:
The parties here are already familiar with the facts and procedural history. Both parties presented their claims and defenses based on lay witness testimony. No party objected to the lack of expert testimony in the district court or on appeal. Thus, we decide the case based on how the parties litigated it. See Marsh v. Butler Cty., 268 F.3d 1014, 1023-24 n. 4 (11th Cir.2001) (en banc).
That said, after review of the parties’ briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s order granting summary judgement in favor of Defendant Sunoco, Inc. on all of Plaintiff NJN Systems Inc.’s claims, and that order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.