PER CURIAM:
Ernest D. Newman, Texas prisoner # 1892170, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Newman argues that the dismissal was improper because he was not proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP).
Newman does not challenge the district court’s determination that he is subject to the § 1915(g) bar, and the record reflects that Newman never paid the filing fee in the district court. Because Newman is subject to the § 1915(g) bar, he may not proceed IFP without showing that his “is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” § 1915(g). Newman has failed to make that showing. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.