PER CURIAM.
Gary Barfield challenges the district court’s dismissal of Barfield’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit after holding a pretrial evidentiary hearing. After careful consideration of all the evidence, the district court concluded there was no evidence from which a jury could find the correctional officials acted with deliberate indifference to Barfield’s serious medical needs. Based on our de novo review, see Randle v. Parker, 48 F.3d 301, 303 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review), we agree with the district court and thus affirm the order of dismissal. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.