LAW.coLAW.co

WALTER SUTTON BAYSDEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

Supreme Court of North Carolina2013-01-25No. No. 522A11
366 N.C. 370

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

■ PER CURIAM.

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court .are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010); Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).

AFFIRMED.